There is substantive proof of a long history of weather modification,
and climatic control, as well as chemtrail spraying in order to effect
weather and climatic control..

In 1986 Crispen Tickell (a high level atmospheric scientist /
administrator) wrote the following in his paper "Climatic Change and
World Affairs." which is online at :

"The first would be designed to cover all major experiments by
governments (or those for whom they were responsible) which were
intended to test the behaviour of the climate or which might
inadvertently do so. There would be obvious problems over the
definition of what should count as a major experiment. This difficulty
arose in the negotiation of the Convention on the Prohibition of
Military or any other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification
Techniques of 1977: how should we interpret "... environmental
modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe
effects ..."?

http://www.crispintickell.com/page77.html
<http://www.crispintickell.com/page77.html>

It is important to note if you actually look up the Convention on the
Prohibition of Military and any other hostile Use of Environmental
Modification Technique (a UN Paper) - it will state right in the
framework agreement that weather modification is permitted (as long as
it is for peaceful purposes).

http://www.opcw.org/html/db/cwc/more/enmod.html
<http://www.opcw.org/html/db/cwc/more/enmod.html>

Crispin if you actuall take the time to read his 'call for action' you
will quckly see a number of high level weather modification
experiments that have been conducted in the past - he specifically
mentions the following..

"Examples of activities which should come within this category are
experiments in rainmaking and control of hail storms over a defined
area; attempts to disperse hurricanes and typhoons; systematic towing
of icebergs away from polar waters to supply fresh water to arid
regions; and putting certain objects into space (such as the needles
placed in orbit by the United States several years ago against
protests from many scientists). Some such experiments might be of
scientific value and economic benefit, and might deserve full
international encouragement and support. The purpose of an agreement
would not be to frustrate them, but simply to ensure that their
implications were properly considered and understood in time. "

Think about what you just read,

1. Examples of activities (weather modification) were listed as follows.
- Towing Iceburgs
- Water diversion
- Cloud Seeding to trigger rain or control of hail storms
- NEEDLES PLACED IN ORBIT.

Hold on here, did you just read that correctly, he is talking about
orbital satellites that can effect weather modification, and that many
scientists were highly opposed to this. What is this 'needles placed
in orbit' bit - by the US (probably the military)

You see the information is all there, just go to the top of our
scientific circles and read what they wrote.

US Militarys Plan for Total Weather Dominance.

Barnes, a consultant on the Air Force study, calmly outlined the
history of the U.S. military's weather modification programs and what
would be needed for future fully-integrated weather modification
capabilities. The good doctor referenced the document "Spacecast
2020," later updated in "Weather As A Force Multiplier: Owning the
Weather in 2025," which noted that "Atmospheric scientists have
pursued terrestrial weather modification in earnest since the 1940's.
. . . Space presents us with a new arena, technology provides new
opportunities. . . "

While Spacecast 2020 had analyzed "the difficulty, cost and risk of
developing a weather control system for military applications" as
"extremely high," Barnes offered a different perspective. He saw
"opportunities to capitalize on investment militarily [as]
Medium/High" while the "Political implications/health hazards [were]
Medium/Low."

http://www.willthomas.net/chemtrails/Articles/Weather_Warfare.htm
<http://www.willthomas.net/chemtrails/Articles/Weather_Warfare.htm>

in 2007 it got better a secretive bill was passed establishing a 11
member panel - and the Bill was stated as follows ""Weather
Mitigation Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2007"

Here are some details of it : bills were not referred to Committees on
Agriculture, Natural Resources, the Environmental Protection Agency,
or Forestry, and that you were not invited to debate the merits of
these bills by your elected representatives.

"It is the purpose of this act to develop and implement a
comprehensive and coordinated national weather mitigation policy and a
national cooperative Federal and State program of weather mitigation
and research."

http://www.newswithviews.com/Peterson/rosalind8.htm
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Peterson/rosalind8.htm>

__._,_.___Informant: zebra77aInformant: zebra77aInformant: zebra77a