Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Reporting on the Bilderberg meeting
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
news.omega  
View profile  
 More options Jun 12 2008, 8:34 am
From: "news.omega" <news.om...@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:34:13 +0200
Local: Thurs, Jun 12 2008 8:34 am
Subject: Reporting on the Bilderberg meeting

[ spbe_tmp.html 18K ]


http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=119241;show_parent=1

Re: Reporting on the Bilderberg meeting
Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:31
72.201.43.207

Reporting on the Bilderberg meeting

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: BBC
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:00:58 -0400
From: Ian McFerran ianmcferran@aol.com
To: apfn@apfn.org


Dear Miss Jubin,

Many thanks for taking the time to reply to me. May I just follow up with a few quick points that I would like you view on (by you, I mean the BBC)?

1) How is the public able to decide if they are interested or not if "news-outlets" don't tell them?

2) If, according to what you say, a proportion of the public might not find it interesting, then surely that means another proportion of them will? What about them? Why are those who will find it interesting being ignored? This question leads onto my next one...

3) Does the BBC not find it "news-worthy", or resent (given it is still ongoing - this could even be called a "Breaking-Story") or even "INTERESTING", that large numbers of high-level politicians, bankers, and general movers & shakers in the world (including Clinton and Obama hours before the final count was announced) were meeting in secret (and have done since 1954) and are discussing matters of future policies, currencies, economic strategies, etc, and how to bring into effect and even who will run/will elections (statements from insiders cooberating that statement and history proving it - Tony Blare and Margaret Thatcher, amongst MANY others, were both members of this group and BOTH became leaders of their respective Parties within ONE year of attending and both then went on to run the country) "interesting" and worthy of presenting these hidden facts to the licence-fee-paying public?

4) Does the BBC hold any view/position as to why "ALL" of the international main-stream "news-outlets" are silent on this meeting?

If you personally are unable to answer any of these question, you are most welcome to forward this email to someone who can speak on behalf of the BBC about its position on this matter.

Thank you once again for your assistance so far and I look forward to hearing from you in due course.

Yours sincerely,

Ian McFerran


-----Original Message-----
From: complaintresponse@bbc.co.uk
To: ianmcferran@aol.com
Sent: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 8:58 pm
Subject: BBC Complaints [T20080608008XS010Z3670003]

Dear Mr McFerran

Thank you for your email.

I understand you feel the BBC should be reporting on the Bilderberg meeting as
you feel it is an extremely important issue.

BBC News is more than aware that a report that is of great interest to one part
of our audience may be of little interest to another. The choice of which
reports are included in the news has more to do with whether it is news that has
just come in and needs immediate coverage, how unusual it is and how much
national interest there is in the subject matter. The choice has to be selective
and no matter how carefully such decisions are made, news editors are always
aware that some people may disagree with them.

You may rest assured that I do understand your concerns, however I hope this
goes someway to explaining the very difficult decisions news editors have to
make and why they make them. You may rest assured that your comments have been
registered and brought to the attention of BBC News.

Thank you for taking the time to contact us to express the strength of your
views.

Regards

Ross Jubin
BBC Complaints
__________________________________________

-----Original Message-----

{Comments:}
This is not just about the BBC it is about all UK & USA "news" outlets!
Why are you not reporting on The Bilderberg meeting being held right
now? See here: http://www.infowars.com/?p=2564 and here:
http://www.infowars.com/?p=2575. What is your justification, given
that is, on the face of it, an increadably important story? BBC, please
explain!


  • 6/11/08 - RADIO YOUR WAY.... ? APFN, Wed Jun 11 10:06
    6/10/08 MSNBC: COUNTDOWN: JONATHAN TURLEY, LAW PROFESSOR"BUSH HIDING IN PLAN SIGHT"HOWARD FINDMAN REMARKS ON BUSH IMPEACHMENT!AUDIO:http://www.apfn.net/pogo90/L001I080610-187A.MP3CHARLES LAST WEEK ON ... more
    • The Charles Goyette Show".... RE: BEST OF:http://www.apfn.net/Messageboard/09-10-06/discussion.cgi.56.html8/23/06 "The Charles Goyette Show" KNFX 1100 AM PHX AZInterview: Popular Mech Daven... more
    • BBC uncovers lost Iraq billions ? APFN, Wed Jun 11 10:51
      BBC uncovers lost Iraq billionsBy Jane CorbinBBC NewsA BBC investigation estimates that around $23bn (£11.75bn) may have been lost, stolen or just not properly accounted for in Iraq.The BBC's... more
    • Re: Reporting on the Bilderberg meeting ? APFN, Wed Jun 11 10:31


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google