Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Saving and Restoring Forests Saves Far More Carbon Emissions than Biofuels
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
news.omega  
View profile  
 More options Dec 12 2007, 11:17 am
From: "news.omega" <news.om...@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:17:32 +0100
Local: Wed, Dec 12 2007 11:17 am
Subject: Saving and Restoring Forests Saves Far More Carbon Emissions than Biofuels

[ http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=biofuel

Plant trees, lots of them, you can never plant enough!
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3515163/ ]

[ spbe_tmp.html 3K ]


file:///C:/DOKUME~1/ADMINI~1/LOKALE~1/Temp/sv6k.tmp/sv7p.tmp/webpreview.htm

ISIS Press Release 12/12/07 

Saving and Restoring Forests Saves Far More Carbon Emissions than Biofuels

Biofuels out forests in, scientists advise policy-makers to concentrate on increasing fuel efficiency in the short term and restoring unused croplands to forests. Selective harvesting of wood waste and biomass from standing forests may be sustainable. Dr. Mae-Wan Ho 

Biofuels have been widely and mistakenly promoted for mitigating carbon missions as fossil energy is at or past its peak [1] (Biofuels: Biodevastation, Hunger & False Carbon Credits, SiS 33). Many critics have pointed out that biofuels compete for land that should be growing food, and furthermore, they give poor, even negative energy returns when proper lifecycle accounting is done [2] (Biofuels for Oil Addicts, SiS 30). More importantly, bioenergy crops are a strong driver of deforestation, which results in net release of huge amounts of CO2. 

Rento Righelato of the World Land Trust, Suffolk, and Dominick V Spracklen at University of Leeds in the UK have compared the carbon mitigation potentials of various biofuels with other uses of the land required for growing the bioenergy crop [3]. As land is the limiting resource, they argue, the appropriate basis for comparison is the amount of C saved per hectare a year. A period of 30 years is used for comparison, which seems reasonable, as it takes time for bioenergy crop plantations to mature and for carbon stocks of cut forests to turn into carbon dioxide. Moreover, it would take that much time for ‘carbon-free’ fuel technology to be widely available. 

Read the rest of this article here
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/savingRainforests.php

Or read more articles about climate change
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/climateglobalwarming.php

This article can be found on the I-SIS website at
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/savingRainforests.php




    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google