Web Images Videos Maps Shopping Groups Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Yes, we are being sprayed
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
news.omega  
View profile  
 More options Mar 6 2008, 10:02 am
From: "news.omega" <news.om...@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:02:19 +0100
Local: Thurs, Mar 6 2008 10:02 am
Subject: Yes, we are being sprayed
Some days ago I saw that you didn't have the 2nd and 3rd part of the
article on Chemtrails.

Regards,
Dorothee

http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20071219.htm

 >From the December 2007 Idaho Observer:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*

Part 2: Yes, we are being sprayed

*/

This is the second part of an article that follows leads from government
sources proving that the unwitting (non-informed, non-consenting) public
is being sprayed with a variety of chemicals. Most of them have military
applications and are deployed as platforms for cloaking, virtual imaging
and communications technologies to enhance national security. But these
national security-enhancing chemicals have known toxicity and are,
without question, adversely affecting all life on earth.

/*

By Carol Pellatt

*

*Aerosols over America*

*San Francisco. *_Special Military Report No. 142_ "Biological Warfare
Trials at San Francisco, California" was a series of six, open air
vulnerability tests performed upon the unknowing people of this city
from Sept 20 thru 27, 1950. Ships filled with bacterial aerosols along
with zinc cadmium sulphide florescent particles were positioned offshore
and 43 sampling stations were set up onshore. Each of the releases
lasted 30 minutes and engulfed the city.

According to Andrew Goliszek, "Based on the report, nearly everyone in
San Francisco inhaled 5,000 or more florescent particles each day for
the duration of the tests."

No one was ever warned and there was no post experiment monitoring of
people's health. And people did die.

*Minneapolis. *_Joint Quarterly report No. 3_ is a military report on
the spraying of Minneapolis with zinc cadmium sulphide florescent
particles over a three-month period in 1953. The people were never
forewarned. Zinc cadmium sulphide is a silvery-white electropositive
metal. It is used to test dispersal patterns. This means it acts like an
X-ray in the sky showing the routes that  sprayed particulates take when
dispersing.

The military, in a "hazardous chemicals" report, admits that, "Cadmium
oxide fume is a severe pulmonary irritant; cadmium dust also is a
pulmonary irritant, but it is less potent than cadmium fume because it
has a larger particle size. The dust, at high concentrations, could be
expected to cause the same physiological effects as those arising from
fume exposure. Exposure to airborne cadmium is associated with
nephrotoxicity. Several inorganic cadmium compounds cause malignant
tumors in animals."

Repeated exposure to lower levels of cadmium in air has resulted in
chronic poisoning characterized by irreversible lung injury of the
emphysematous type with abnormal lung function.

In a report from the International Occupational Safety and Health
Information Centre (CIS), The International Labour Organization warns of
Zinc Cadmium Sulphide:   "Prevent dispersion of dust! Avoid all
contact!"  On the effects of long term exposure, "Lungs may be affected
by repeated or prolonged exposure. The substance may have effects on the
kidneys and bone tissue, resulting in kidney impairment and bone
weakness. This substance is carcinogenic to humans."

*St. Louis. *_Joint Quarterly Report No. 4_  describes "The Spraying of
St. Louis" with the same metal over a three-month period in 1953. The
people were never warned. No follow-up health studies were done for the
victims. Because this metal is electropositive, it is likely to be part
of the toxic cocktail we see spilling out of military jets into our
skies today for use in electromagnet weapons testing, experimentation,
and implementation.

*Utah.* We know by their own reports that the military has dropped nerve
agent VX out of jets over Utah, actually over half a million pounds over
an 18-year period (1951–1968). Once again, the people were not informed.

*Hawaii.* In 1965, Operation Big Tom involved the spraying of bacillus
globigii over Oahu during a 2-month period. No civilians were informed;
no one's health was subsequently monitored.

For three months in 1966, the air force dropped bomblets filled with
benzilic acid—a mind-altering chemical—into the Waiakea Forest Reserve
southwest of Hilo, Hawaii. No civilians were warned.

*Just a few examples.* These are by no means the only documented cases
of open air vulnerability testing on unsuspecting civilian populations.
This research paper represents a small sample in a large volume of
documentation that attests to the fact of the military's abuse of
civilian populations and it's abuse of the earth as a whole.

It should be noted that none of this information was given of free
accord. It was gathered during congressional hearings, lawsuits, and
investigations. We can only assume, from the monumental efforts required
to acquire these reports and the government's typical 30-year delay in
declassifying documents—whatever documents they have not already
destroyed or hidden—that many more heinous and dangerous experiments
have been performed than we will ever be privy to. And based on this
consistent history of the military's abhorrent behavior in these
matters, we can also assume that experimentation has never ceased and
continues today without our knowledge or consent.

*Deliberate Radioactive Releases*

*Kodak.* If not for the Kodak company in Rochester New York, many of the
government's deliberate radiation releases may not have come to light.
Not long after the Trinity Sight blast in Alamogordo, New Mexico, in
June, 1946, customers started complaining to the Kodak company in New
York about fogged film.

A scientist from Kodak realized that the film was packed in corn husks
from Indiana. He took samples that were analyzed, and they were found to
contain Iodine-131. Kodak complained to the government. Six years later,
as people went about their lives in Rochester, they had no idea that the
Geiger counter readings at the Kodak plant read 25 times higher than
usual. Kodak complained again.

After these two incidents, the government provided the Kodak corporation
with maps and potential fallout zones for future tests. However, the
people were never warned.

Not by the government, or by Kodak. Dairy farmers never knew, children
playing in snow saturated with radioactive fallout never knew; pregnant
mothers never knew. It's important to note that experimental detonations
of nuclear weapons was not the only cause of the disproportionate amount
of radiation that runs rampant in our atmosphere today.

*Hanford.* During the cold war, the U.S. government, in an effort to
test it's newly installed radiation detectors, deliberately released
radioactive material from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in southeast
Washington state.

This experiment, on December 2, 1949, was considered a disaster. The
meteorologists miscalculated the weather, specifically the winds, on the
day of the releases. The intensity of the releases, coupled with very
strong winds, created a drift pattern 40 miles wide and 200 miles long,
exposing all in that plume to 400 times the amount of radiation
considered safe. The people were never warned.

In 1962, Hanford performed deliberate releases throughout the entire
year, as part of an experimental program. In their modus of operandi,
the military didn't disclose this to the public.

*Cigarettes. *The cigarette industry became aware in the 1950s that the
spike in lung, tracheal, and bronchial cancer was due to the fact that
tobacco crops were increasingly being fertilized with chemicals that
contained radioactive substances. An internal memo from Philip Morris in
1961 acknowledged the presence of strontium-90 in tobacco. The Surgeon
General C. Everett Koop stated that radioactivity, rather than tar,
accounts for at least  90 percent of all smoking-related lung cancers.
The Center for Disease Control  concluded "Americans are exposed to far
more radiation from tobacco smoke than from any other source."

U.S. patent No. 4,194,514 describes the process used to remove
radioactive polonium from tobacco products, validating the comments above.

*Spectator sport.* Regarding nuclear testing in the Bikini Islands, the
Marshall Islands and at Alamogordo New Mexico, people were encouraged to
watch nuclear blasts It's not just unsuspecting civilians who fall prey
to chemical and biological warfare experimentation.

*

Smorgasbord

*

Thousands of prisoners have been used as well as children, the elderly
and the sick. And the military doesn't spare it's own. Soldiers are
bullied into becoming guinea pigs to be injected, infected and to inhale
and ingest all types of experimental pathogens. Remember Agent Orange?
Gulf War Syndrome? There are scores of reports you can read on Gulf War
Illness, depleted uranium and mycoplasma. And it's been an obvious fact
since the 60s that the military has a shameful system in place for
caring for their injured, crippled, and traumatized soldiers.

*Agent Orange.* Just in from Montreal is a new report on the spraying of
Canadian soldiers with Agent Orange by the U.S. military in New
Brunswick, Canada. The U.S. military tested Agent Orange at Gagetown for
three days in 1966 and for four days in 1967.  According to the report,
as reported by The Montreal Gazette Aug 22, 2007, "Only individuals who
had direct contact with herbicides at CFB Gagetown in New Brunswick are
at risk of contracting a number of diseases associated with exposure,
including various cancers, Parkinson's disease and Type 2 diabetes."

According to Denis Furlong, a government researcher, "While probably
only dozens of people were involved in the application, we do know that
a lot of members of the Canadian forces were in the area and in the
vicinity."

Jim Burke, a former Gagetown base soldier who now lives in Saint John,
N.B., reacted angrily when he heard the study results. Burke says he was
sprayed with Agent Orange ...

read more »


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Omega Group  
View profile  
 More options Mar 6 2008, 10:06 am
From: Omega Group <news.om...@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 01:06:28 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Mar 6 2008 10:06 am
Subject: Re: Yes, we are being sprayed
    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google