Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
news.omega  
View profile  
 More options Jul 26 2008, 8:54 am
From: "news.omega" <news.om...@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:54:23 +0200
Local: Sat, Jul 26 2008 8:54 am
Subject: Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment)

[ spbe_tmp.html 16K ]


http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=119937;show_parent=1

C-SPAN: Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment)
Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:34
72.201.43.207

C-SPAN: Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment)

Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment)
Today

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) talked to the Washington Journal
about today's Judiciary Cmte. hearing on the executive power
and the Bush Admin. The hearing is partly based on a single
article of impeachment he brought against Pres. Bush, and on
alleged misconduct and unlawful expansion of executive power.

http://www.c-span.org/

C-SAPN WATCH LIVE:
http://www.c-span.org/watch/
=============================================

Committee hearing will discuss presidential limits
Detroit Free Press, United States - 3 hours ago
Originally called an examination of Bush's "imperial
presidency," today's agenda simply referred to it as
"executive power and its constitutional ...
MORE:>>

Committee hearing will discuss presidential limits

By TODD SPANGLER ? FREE PRESS WASHINGTON STAFF ? July 25, 2008

WASHINGTON -- The House Judiciary Committee is underway today with a hearing on the presidency and executive authority. Whether it's an impeachment hearing or not depends on who you ask.
Advertisement

"To the regret of many, this is not an impeachment hearing," said John Conyers, the Detroit Democrat who chairs the committee. He was responding to Iowa Republican Steve King's claim that the committee was talking of impeaching the president, whether it wanted to say it outright or not.

What was clear was that Democratic leadership wanted to allow a hearing that would discuss whether President Bush has overstepped his authority while at the same time making it clear that impeachment is off the table.

That is certainly not the feeling of some Democrats, however. Florida's Robert Wexler called for impeachment hearings outright and Ohio's Dennis Kucinich has introduced a resolution that Bush be impeached under accusations he misled the nation in the walkup to the Iraq War.

Conyers said Congress has the responsibility to examine the presidency -- even if impeachment is apparently off the table. Today's hearing then appeared to be more of an examination of the president's record and whether it has overstepped his authority.

Ranking Republican Lamar Smith said it was more like "an anger management class."

"Nothing is going to come out of this hearing with regard to impeachment of the president. ... The Democratic leadership has said time and again that they have no intention of bringing any impeachment resolution," Smith said.

"Why is that? Because they know it wouldn't pass."

-----------------------------

RE: APFN IRAQ WAR INFO AND LINKS:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/iraq_war.htm

RE: APFN LEAKGATE INFO AND LINKS:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/leakgate.htm

ALSO SEE MANY VIDEOS
http://www.apfn.net/videos.asp


http://www.apfn.net/videos.asp

...

read more »


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
news.omega  
View profile  
 More options Jul 29 2008, 9:19 am
From: "news.omega" <news.om...@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:19:39 +0200
Local: Tues, Jul 29 2008 9:19 am
Subject: Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment)

[ APFN - AUDIO C-SPAN Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment).htm 32K ]

AUDIO: C-SPAN: Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment)
Mon Jul 28, 2008 17:49
72.201.43.207

MEDIA BLACKOUT OF THIS HEARING... NETWORK

AUDIO: C-SPAN: Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment)

THIS IS A HISTORY MAKING HEARING!

Judiciary Cmte. hearing on the executive power
and the Bush Admin. The hearing is partly based on a single
article of impeachment he brought against Pres. Bush, and on
alleged misconduct and unlawful expansion of executive power.
C-SPAN: Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment)
AUDIO: (THIS IS A 2 HOUR HEARING THAT TURNED INTO 6 HOURS:

AUDIO: PART I
http://www.apfn.net/pogo99/L001I080725-2008A.MP3

AUDIO: PART II
http://www.apfn.net/pogo99/L002I080725-2603B.MP3

AUDIO: PART III
http://www.apfn.net/pogo99/L003I080725-1308C.MP3

=======================

C-SPAN: Limits of Executive Power (Impeachment)
There Are NO Statutes of Limitations on MURDER
YOUTUBE:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kDzJ1lffu5A

Bush Administration's 935 Lies to Iraq War Part 1 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xz9Ew1UBBj0

Bush Administration's 935 Lies to Iraq War 2 OF 3
YOUTUBE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQMmLiCScZ4

Bush Aministration's 935 Lies to Iraq War Part 3 of 3
YOUTUBE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D81JxE20MRs&feature=related

REF INFO AND LINKS:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/leakgate.htm

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/iraq_war.htm

==============================================
935 Lies on the Way to a War

By Scott Horton
http://harpers.org/archive/2008/01/hbc-90002235

MEDIA BLACKOUT OF THIS HEARING... NETWORK

Notes from the Non-Impeachment Hearings
OpEdNews, PA - Jul 27, 2008
... originally billed the hearing as "The Imperial
Presidency" and later milded down even that, to "Executive
Power and Its Constitutional Limitations. ...
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Notes-from-the-Non-Impeach-by-mikel-weisser-080726-259.html

y mikel weisser Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

BACKGROUND: some time around Monday evening, June 9, there was a giddy moment when it seemed that justice was still possible in America. On the Friday before, the Senate Intelligence committee had issued their report condemning the Bush propaganda machine efforts to kick-start the Iraq War as intentional deception. As folks had been saying along Bush lied, Thousands Died. Impeach. And by that following Monday, Dennis Kucinich stood before the assembled might of the US Congress and read 35 different, verifiable, reasons George Bush could at last be removed from office. All across America millions of citizen finally exhaled our sighs of relief and waited for history to happen. And of course it didn't.

As planned. With Speaker Pelosi sternly disapproving and Steny Hoyer dutifully leading his majority away from the topic with all post haste, it turned out the Republican party were the ones who championed hearing for impeachment, hoping to easily out debate and embarrass Dem leadership. They actually pressed to have the thing heard right there, but it wound up in committee, presumably to die.

And so we waited through June, recurring calls to the Judiciary gave no clue that their stance on why impeachment should not be discussed and when challenged as ineffective against Bush, Conyers office would refer to the ousting of Alberto Gonzales, who was embarrassed out of office over the Attorney General firings. So true to the promise he made to Congress and to the American people, when Congress failed to act for more than 30 Days, on July 11th, Kucinich again introduced impeachment but this time focusing on one charge: the deceptions of imminent threat regarding Hussein in the fall of '02.

And somehow an amazing thing happened: on the 17th Conyers Judiciary Committee announced hearings. While the bombshell flashed through the online progressive community, it remained a non-starter for mainstream media. Unlike either the Nixon Hearings over Watergate or Clinton's BJ impeachment, no mainstream media outlet had plans to cover the hearing live for the public to decide. In fact when called in a July 24th survey of the major TV news networks, NBC backpedaled through 6, count 'em, 6 different viewer service reps who didn't even know who to ask to find out if the network was covering it. And the guy who answered the phone in the ABC national news newsroom, not only had not heard about the hearings and but did not even know how to check on the Judiciary committee's schedule of upcoming hearings. When finally guided to the public notice, he grudgingly allowed they'd "do something on it, I'm sure," and hug up.

Of course not wanting to draw too much attention to the hearings in advance, the ever meek Conyers originally billed the hearing as "The Imperial Presidency" and later milded down even that, to "Executive Power and Its Constitutional Limitations." In fact when the hearings finally started after a good twenty minutes of live glad-handing, Conyers duly admonished the crowd they were not allowed to show any reaction to any statements made and both witnesses and committee members were neither allowed to speak of impeachment nor in the pejorative in general of the president or name him directly in any accusatory fashion.

A faux rule which easily fell to the wayside once the testimonies started. At first I was so dazzled by the fact that the hearings were even happening, that my wife and daughter and I got up early and gathered in front of the TV at 7am AZ time for the opening gavel on CSPAN and just stared open mouthed.

The line that eventually got me to realize I could be taking notes was, "Informed criticism, as annoying as it may be to those in positions of power, is the stuff of democracy"-Brad Miller D-NC in his opening remarks.

What follows is an attempt keep up live with the pace of the action over the nearly six hour hearing. I
...

read more »


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google