http://www.labournet.net/world/0802/ilwu1may2.html

*West Coast Longshoremen will stop work to protest war!*

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&...

http://www.labournet.net/world/0802/ilwu1may2.html
*

ILWU letter to AFL-CIO on 1 May anti-war stoppage*
Published: 25/02/08/
/

*Download original* <http://www.labournet.net/world/0802/ilwu1may2.pdf>*
(PDF*

International
Longshore &
Warehouse Union
AFL-CIO  1188 Franklin Street
San Francisco
California 94109
(415) 775-0533
(415 775-1302 FAX
www.ilwu.org

Robert McEllrath
President  Joseph R. Radisich
Vice President  Wesley Furtado
Vice President  William E. Adams
Secretary-Treasurer

February 22, 2008

John J. Sweeney, President
AFL-CIO
815 16th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006

President Sweeney,
ILWU delegates recently concluded a two-week caucus where we reached agreement on our approach for bargaining a new Pacific Coast Longshore Contract that expires on July 1, 2008. We expect talks to begin sometime in March and will keep you informed of developments.
One of the resolutions adopted by caucus delegates called on longshore workers to stop work during the day shift on May 1, 2008, to express their opposition to the war in Iraq.
We’re writing to inform you of this action, and inquire if other AFL-CIO affiliates are also planning to participate in similar events on May 1 to honor labor history and express support for the troops by bringing them home safely.
We would appreciate your assistance with spreading word about this May 1 action.
In solidarity,
Robert McEllrath
 International President

http://www.transportworkers.org/node/711

  ILWU to Shut Down West Coast Ports May 1 Demanding End to War in Iraq,
  Afghanistan

*/In a major step for the U.S. labor movement, the International
Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) has announced that it will shut
down West Coast ports on May 1, to demand an immediate end to the war
and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and the withdrawal of U.S. troops
from the Middle East./* In a February 22 letter to AFL-CIO president
John Sweeney, ILWU International president Robert McEllrath reported
that at a recent coast-wide union meeting, “One of the resolutions
adopted by caucus delegates called on longshore workers to stop work
during the day shift on May 1, 2008 to express their opposition to the
war in Iraq.”

*/This is the first time in decades that an American union has decided
to undertake industrial action against a U.S. war./* It is doubly
important that this mobilization of labor’s power is to take place on
May Day, the international workers day, which is not honored in the U.S.
Moreover, the resolution voted by the ILWU delegates opposes not only
the hugely unpopular war in Iraq, but also the war and occupation of
Afghanistan (which Democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack
Obama and Republican John McCain all want to expand). The motion to shut
down the ports also demands the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the
entire region, including the oil sheikdoms of the strategically
important Persian/Arab Gulf.

The Internationalist Group has fought from the moment U.S. troops
invaded Afghanistan in September 2002 for American unions to */strike
against the war./* Despite the fact that millions have marched in the
streets of Europe and the United States against the war in Iraq, the war
goes on. Neither of the twin war parties of U.S. imperialism – Democrats
and Republicans – and none of the capitalist candidates will stop this
horrendous slaughter that has already killed hundreds of thousands of
Iraqis. The only way to stop the Pentagon killing machine is by
mobilizing the power of a greater force – that of the international
working class.

*/The action announced by the powerful West Coast dock workers union, to
stop work to stop the war, should be taken up by unions and labor
organizations throughout the United States and internationally./* The
ILWU should be commended for courageously taking the first step, and it
is up to working people everywhere to back them up. Wherever support is
strong enough, on May 1 there should be mass walkouts, sick-outs, labor
marches, plant-gate meetings, lunch-time rallies, teach-ins. And the
purpose of such actions should be not to beg the bourgeois politicians
whose hands are covered with blood, having voted for every war budget
for six and a half years, but a show of strength of the working people
who make this country run, and who can shut it down!

Now is the time for bold class action. Opposition to the war is even
greater in the U.S. working class than in the population as a whole,
more than two-thirds of which wants to stop the war but is stymied by
the capitalist political system. In his letter to Sweeney, the ILWU
president asked “if other AFL-CIO affiliates are planning to participate
in similar events.” Labor militants should make sure the answer to that
question is a resounding “yes!”

There should be no illusions that this will be easy. No doubt the
Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) bosses will try to get the courts to
rule the stop-work action illegal. The ILWU leadership could get cold
feet, since this motion was passed because of overwhelming support from
the delegates despite attempts to stop it or, failing that, to water it
down or limit the action. And the U.S. government could try to ban it on
the grounds of “national security,” just as Bush & Co. slapped a
Taft-Hartley injunction on the docks during contract negotiations in the
fall of 2002, saying that any work stoppage was a threat to the “war
effort,” and threatened to occupy the ports with troops!

The answer to every attempt to sabotage or undercut this first labor
action against this war, and against Washington’s broader “war on
terror” which is intended to terrorize the world into submission must be
to redouble efforts to bring out workers’ power independent of the
capitalist parties and politicians. If the ILWU work stoppage is
successful, it will only be a small, but very important, beginning that
must be generalized and deepened. */It will take industrial-strength
labor action to defeat the imperialist war abroad and the bosses’ war on
immigrants, oppressed minorities, poor and working people “at home.”/*

      ILWU in the Forefront of Labor Action Against the War

Workers strike action against imperialist war isn’t new – it just hasn’t
happened here for a long, long time. During World War I there were huge
mass strikes in Germany against the battlefield carnage, culminating in
the downfall of the kaiser in November 1918. A year earlier in Russia,
working-class opposition to the war led to the overthrow of the tsar and
the October Revolution led by Lenin and Trotsky’s Bolsheviks. The
Internationalist Group and League for the Fourth International call
today for transport workers to “hot cargo” (refuse to handle) war
shipments. In the early 1920s, Communist-led French dock workers did
exactly that, boycotting ships carrying war materiel to suppress a
colonial rebellion in the Rif region of Morocco, as they also did during
France’s war in Indochina in the 1950s.

In the U.S., the ILWU struck in 1948 amid Cold War hysteria and in
defiance of the “slave labor” Taft-Hartley Act to defend its union
hiring hall against the bosses and government screaming about “reds” in
the union leadership. In 1953, at the height of McCarthyite
witch-hunting, the ILWU called a four-day general strike in Hawaii of
sugar, pineapple and dock workers over the jailing of seven union
members for being communists. During the Vietnam War, socialist
historian Isaac Deutscher said that he would trade all the peace marches
for a single dock strike. The ILWU was the first U.S. union to oppose
the Vietnam war, but during war and especially during the 1971 strike
union leader Harry Bridges refused to stop the movement of military
cargo. (Ship owners made use of this by falsely labeling cargo as
“military” to evade picket lines and undermine the strike.) This
betrayal went hand in hand with a “mechanization and modernization”
contract that slashed union jobs.

As the U.S.-led imperialist invasion of Iraq was looming, in January
2003 train drivers in Scotland refused to move a freight train carrying
munitions to a NATO military base. The next month, Italian railroad
unionists and antiwar activists blocked NATO war trains by occupying the
rails. In the United States, ILWU dock workers were a target of
“anti-terrorist” government repression, as police fired supposedly “less
than lethal” munitions point blank at an antiwar protest on the Oakland,
California docks, injuring six longshore workers and arresting 25 people
(who eventually won their legal case against the police). And every year
since the war started, the San Francisco/Oakland ILWU Local 10 has voted
for motions for labor action against the war. Usually they were voted
down at caucuses and conventions of the ILWU, but not this time.

Last May, Local 10 longshoremen and Local 34 ships clerks refused to
cross picket lines set up by the Oakland Teachers Association and
antiwar activists, defying arbitrators’ orders by refusing to work ships
of the notorious antiunion outfit, Stevedoring Services of America (see
“Oakland Dock Workers Honor Picket, Shut Down War Cargo Shipper,” /The
Internationalist/ No. 26, July 2007). In the aftermath of that action,
the union issued a call for a Labor Conference to Stop the War that
would “plan workplace rallies, labor mobilizations in the streets and
strike action against the war.” The Call to Action stated:

“ILWU Local 10 has repeatedly warned that the so-called ‘war on terror’
is really a war on working people and democratic rights. Around the
country, hundreds of unions and labor councils have passed motions
condemning the war, but that has not stopped the war. We need to use
labor’s muscle to stop the war by mobilizing union power in the streets,
at the plant gates and on the docks to force the immediate and total
withdrawal of all U. S. troops from Afghanistan and Iraq.”

As the conference date approached, the union was the target of several
police attacks, including a vicious cop assault on two black dock
workers from San Francisco working in the port of Sacramento. Some 250
demonstrators from every ILWU local in Northern California rallied in
their defense outside the courthouse. Their trial to be set march 18 at
a hearing will encounter even larger demonstrations.

The Internationalist Group and its union supporters helped build and
attended the October 20 conference, along with some 150 labor and
socialist activists from the Bay Area, elsewhere in California and
across the country. At the meeting, a particular focus was resistance to
the Transportation Workers Identification Card (TWIC), which threatens
minority workers and the union hiring hall, and which the Democratic
Party in particular has been pushing in order to carry out a purge of
dock workers in the name of the “war on terror.” Not long after that
conference, a federal judge ordered Local 10 elections canceled and
replaced by a Labor Department-run vote, on the eve of 2008 contract
bargaining. Federal agents even invaded the union hall to enforce their
order. This action is a threat to the independence of all unions.

This set the stage for the recent longshore-warehouse caucus, which
voted a motion for a 24-hour “No Peace, No Work Holiday” against the
war. The resolution was introduced in Local 10 by Jack Heyman, who also
presented the motion for the 24 April 1999 coast-wide port shutdown
demanding freedom for Mumia Abu-Jamal, the former Black Panther and
renowned radical journalist who has been on Pennsylvania’s death row for
the last quarter century. Although the union tops maneuvered to prevent
Heyman from being elected as a delegate to the Coast Caucus, the motion
passed in Local 10. At the Caucus, the delegate from Local 34 referred
to the October Labor Conference to Stop the War as the origin of the
motion.

At the close of the Caucus on February 8, there was a vigorous debate on
the resolution. The union tops tried to stop it, to no avail. They kept
asking, “are you sure you want to do this action.” The delegates
overwhelmingly said “yes.” Even conservative trade unionists, including
veterans of the Vietnam War, were getting up saying the government is
lying to us, we’ve had it with this war, we’ve got to put a stop to it
now. So instead the bureaucrats tried to gut the motion, which was cut
down from 24 hours to 8, and changed into a “stop-work” meeting (covered
by a contract clause) instead of a straight-out shutdown, thinking that
this would lessen opposition from the employers. In the end there was a
voice vote and only three delegates out of 100 voted against.

The efforts to undercut the motion continue, as is to be expected from a
leadership which, like the rest of the pro-capitalist labor bureaucracy,
seeks “labor peace” with the bosses. In his letter to Sweeney, ILWU
International president tried to present the action as an effort to
“express support for the troops by bringing them home safely,” although
the motion voted by the delegates says nothing of the sort. Playing the
“support our troops” game is an effort to swear loyalty to the broader
aims of U.S. imperialism. It aids the warmongers, when what’s needed is
independent working-class action against the system that produces
endless imperialist war. Yet despite the efforts to water it down and
distort it, the May 1 action voted for by the ILWU delegates is a call
to use labor’s muscle to put an end to the war.

      Mobilize Labor’s Power to Defeat the Bosses’ War!

For the West Coast dock workers union to shut down the ports against the
war means a big step forward in the class struggle. The Internationalist
Group has uniquely fought for workers strikes against the war, when all
the popular-front “peace” coalitions dismissed this and even some
shamefaced ex-Trotskyists refused to call for it, saying it had “no
resonance” among the workers (see our October 20007 Special Supplement
to /The Internationalist/, “Why We Fight For Workers Strikes Against the
War [and the Opportunists Don’t]”). With signs, banners and propaganda
we have sought to drive home the central lesson that it is necessary to
defeat the imperialist war abroad and the bosses’ war “at home” by
mobilizing the power of the workers movement independent of and against
the capitalist parties.

That means fighting the war mobilization down the line. First and
foremost, this means actively joining the struggle for immigrant rights
as the government turns undocumented working people into “the enemy
within.” Class-conscious workers should demand */full citizenship rights
for all immigrants./* Last year, San Francisco Local 10 voted to stop
work and join marches for immigrant rights on May 1, but this was
opposed by the employers PMA and sabotaged at the last minute by the
union tops. Shamefully, Local 13 in Los Angeles, a majority Mexican
American port, made no protest when police attacked immigrant rights
protesters that same day. Today, as the ICE immigration police stage
Gestapo-style raids across the country, organized labor should take the
lead in organizing rapid response networks to come into the streets to
*/block the raids./* Despite the campaign by the capitalist media and
politicians to whip up anti-immigrant hysteria, there is widespread
disgust among American working people toward the jackbooted storm
troopers who are terrorizing immigrant communities.

At the same time, the unions should use the power to put a halt to the
attacks on civil liberties which are part of the home front of the
imperialist war. Driver’s licenses with biometric data, TWIC
identification cards with “background checks,” warrantless spying and
phone tapping, setting up special military tribunals for “trials” in
which defendants are denied the right of habeas corpus, to know the
“evidence” or even the charges against them – all these are part of a
drive that is in high gear pushing the United States toward a
full-fledged police state. There have been scores, perhaps hundreds of
resolutions by unions and city, county and state labor bodies against
the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act, showing that labor activists are well aware of
the danger. But just as is the case with the countless union antiwar
resolutions, there has been no labor action. It is commonplace in the
labor movement to bemoan the lack of real action when Reagan broke the
1981 PATCO air traffic controllers’ strike, paving the way for massive
union-busting, takeaways and racist attacks all down the line. Let’s not
let the labor bureaucrats bury the vital struggles of today.

&
Warehouse Union

*/Now is the time to turn words into deeds,/* to speak to the capitalist
rulers in the only language they understand. The imperialist war parties
must be defeated by a class mobilization of the working people at the
head of all the oppressed. The ILWU motion to stop work on May Day to
put a stop to the war can provide working people everywhere with the
opening to turn from impotent protest to a struggle for power. For that
the key is to build a class-struggle workers party fighting for a
workers government, for socialist revolution here and around the world,
that will put an end once and for all to the system of endless war,
poverty and racism.

Write to the Internationalist Group, Box 3321, Church Street Station,
New York, NY 10008. E-mail: internationalistgr...@msn.com. Visit us on
the Internet at: www.internationalist.org

http://www.internationalist.org/ <http://www.internationalist.org/>

http://www.labournet.net/world/0802/ilwu1may2.pdf
<http://www.labournet.net/world/0802/ilwu1may2.pdf>

__._,_.___