Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
There's legitimate interrogation, and then there's torture
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
news.omega  
View profile  
 More options Jul 19 2008, 8:42 am
From: "news.omega" <news.om...@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:42:42 +0200
Local: Sat, Jul 19 2008 8:42 am
Subject: There's legitimate interrogation, and then there's torture

[ spbe_tmp.html 14K ]


http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=119826;show_parent=1

There's legitimate interrogation, and then there's torture
Fri Jul 18, 2008 08:06
72.201.43.207

http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2008/07/15/PH2008071502798.jpg
There's legitimate interrogation, and then there's torture
AUDIO:
http://www.apfn.net/pogo98/L006I080715-1308F.MP3


There's legitimate interrogation, and then there's torture
Results 1 - 10 of about 200 for Doug Feith

By Dana Milbank
Wednesday, July 16, 2008; Page A03

For months, if not years, congressional Democrats had craved the chance to pounce on Doug Feith, the former No. 3 at the Pentagon and the brains behind the Iraq WMD claims, torture policy and other great adventures.

Yesterday, House Democrats finally had their quarry, wearing a tie almost as orange as a detainee's jumpsuit, compelled by subpoena to appear before the Judiciary Committee. And then -- an ambush! Republicans on the committee created a diversion, and Feith escaped unscathed.

Mere seconds after the subcommittee chairman, Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), gaveled the start of the hearing with the usual words -- "without objection, the chair is authorized to declare a recess" -- Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) raised his voice.

"Objection! Objection, Mr. Chairman," the backbencher called out.

Nadler was puzzled. "The gentleman wants us to sit here through votes?

"I object to granting unanimous consent to the chair," King maintained.

Nadler was forced to order a voice vote, then a roll-call vote. By the time Feith had spoken his first words, the hearing was nearly an hour old. King and his colleagues went on to declare dozens of objections, parliamentary inquires and points of order, raising concerns about a T-shirt worn by an audience member, a sign spotted in the crowd, and the need for bathroom and lunch breaks for witnesses. Three and a half hours later, Feith had become but an asterisk at what was supposed to be his hanging.

Republicans are chafing in their minority status in both chambers of Congress. Their presidential and congressional candidates lag in the polls, and their president posted a career-low 28 percent approval rating in the new Washington Post-ABC News poll. About the only weapon left in the Republican arsenal is the dilatory maneuver.
ad_icon

Yesterday's opening statements were done, and Nadler turned to the witnesses. "I now want to welcome our -- "

"Mr. Chairman!" King called out. "Mr. Chairman! Is there time for an opening statement?" King, having thus seized the floor, encouraged everybody "to roll our minds back to that terrible day of September 11th, 2001. . . . The day that all of us looked at that blazing inferno tumbling down in New York."

Nadler tried to return to business, but Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who had been whispering and giggling with King like a schoolboy, interrupted anew. "A point of parliamentary inquiry!" he said. He raised three questions, the last of which was a request to "summon" House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

By the time Issa finished, King had reloaded. He gave another speech masquerading as a "clarification."

CONTINUED 1 2 3 Next >
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/15/AR2008071502670_2.html?hpid=opinionsbox1



  • TODAY'S DEMOCRACY NOW!:* The Dark Side: Jane Mayer on the Inside Story of How the War on TerrorTurned Into a War on American Ideals * We spend the hour with New Yorker magazine investigative... more


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google