Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
NEDA Releases a New Proposal for Auditing Elections
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
news.omega  
View profile  
 More options Mar 16 2008, 9:04 am
From: "news.omega" <news.om...@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:04:33 +0100
Local: Sun, Mar 16 2008 9:04 am
Subject: NEDA Releases a New Proposal for Auditing Elections
THE NATIONAL ELECTION DATA ARCHIVE RELEASES A NEW PROPOSAL FOR AUDITING
ELECTIONS

This cost-effective legislative and administrative proposal for
conducting scientific post-election audits can be applied to any
state. It was contributed to by three of Utah's county election
officials, as well as contributed to by prominent Ph.D. mathematicians
and statisticians who are experts in election auditing, a New
Hampshire State Election Official, and many others:

Mandatory Vote Count Audit
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/paper-audits/legislative/Vo...

The fundamentals of scientific election auditing are described here in
lay persons' terms (as much as possible):

Post-Election Vote Count Audits -- Probability Proportional to Margin
Error Bound (PPMEB) Method
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/paper-audits/VoteCountAudit...

The derivation of the formulas for election auditing sample sizes are
posted here for any mathematician to check:

Derivation of the formula for the number of selection rounds for the
Probability Proportional to
Margin Error Bound (PPMEB) method for determining samples for Vote Count
Audits
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/paper-audits/PPMEB-Auditing...

The U.S. Congress should pass H.R. 5036 as soon as possible in order
to provide incentive and means for conducting valid election audits of
the upcoming November 2008 election.

What could possibly excuse exempting the elections industry from the
independent scrutiny of independent auditing?

[ http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Kathy+Dopp ]


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google